Remove current Educational Laws before adding new ones

Remove current Educational Laws before adding new ones

this is less about recess and more about Legislators control of our local classrooms

questionIn Tuesday, December 29th, 2015 Chronicle, reporter Andrew Caplan wrote a good article entitled, ‘A group of senators have proposed a bill that would shake up classrooms once more‘, about a proposed bill to extend recess in elementary classrooms.  I encourage you to read the article by following this link; http://goo.gl/ZUxQxo

While I greatly support and believe that students need recess or free play time, this is less about recess and more about Legislators control of our local classrooms.

Of course we want students to have recess– we were not the ones that made the educational testing laws that put the pressure on students, teachers, schools and districts which created the need to reduced non-instructional time for students. The legislators mandated what standards we must teach; then they used these mandated tests in a punitive manner. Now they are telling us when we should give recess. They already have mandated 150 minutes a week (30 consecutive minutes a day) of physical education/structured student physical activity time (a.k.a. SPA or PA). Now they want to add an additional 100 minutes of recess (20 minutes a day). If passed, this would mean that at the elementary levels 50 minutes a day (or 250 minutes a week) would be physical education/structured student physical activity time, recess/play time.  All by not reducing any of the educational requirements and testing mandated by the state Legislature and Florida Department of Education.

While I love the thought or more recess, the Legislator should I feel first deregulate the educational laws they already passed.  They could start first by removing the current law requiring the 30 minutes a day (150 minutes a week) of structured physical activity and instead let local classroom teachers, schools and districts decide.

MUST READ: Chronicle gets it right again on Best & Brightest!!

MUST READ: Chronicle gets it right again on Best & Brightest!!

31938-12I must thank the Citrus Chronicle Editorial Board once again for its outstanding editorial, ‘On second go, ‘brightest’ idea even dimmer‘ in December 18th, 2015 Chronicle.

The Chronicle’s correct opinion is to “Vote down misguided attempt to reward teachers“.  They go on to say, “It is puzzling that legislative support for this program is so staunch when public support is so lacking. If legislators feel so strongly that highly effective teachers should be rewarded with handsome bonuses, they should give the money to school districts and let them allot it as they see fit.” The Chronicle ends is editorial with, “we must urge Citrus County’s representatives to vote against the measures.”  “…Teachers don’t want it, school districts don’t want it, but legislators do“.

Follow this link to read the entire editorial: http://goo.gl/7bYYBn

Lecture by John Couch, Apple VP of Education

Lecture by John Couch, Apple VP of Education

John_Couch_Apple_2Today at the morning General Session at the 70th Annual Florida School Board Association the featured guest speaker was John Couch, who is the Vice President of Education at Apple, Inc. Couch holds an A.B. in Computer Science from Berkeley. He earned his master’s degree in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. John spent an additional two years in the Computer Science PhD program. He left the program to work for Hewlett Packard as a software engineer. In 2010 John was awarded an Honorary Doctorate from Philadelphia University for his innovative contributions to education.

John was one of the individuals at Apple that was influenced by a visit to Xerox PARC and was involved in the initial graphical user interface for the Lisa system.

I must that my first graphical user interface computer was a Macintosh 512Ke which was developed from the Lisa. What a treat for me to meet the very person who worked developing one of the world’s greatest intuitive computers at the time. A computer system I credit as a significant tool in helping me as a dyslexic and to this day I feel was one of the biggest innovations in personal desktop computing.

John was promoted at Apple to General Manager and Vice President of the newly created Lisa division, called “Personal Office Systems”. He ran the Lisa division through launch. In 1984 John left Apple to take over a struggling Christian school in Solana Beach, CA. In 2002 Steve Jobs asked John to return to Apple to fill the newly created role of vice president of education.

John began his presentation this morning by sharing, what were three things that impacted his thinking on education; first—effective education is not about memorizing; second—Steve Job’s vision of education; and third—John’s son Kris.

John_Couch_Apple_1“All books, learning materials, and assessments should be digital and interactive, tailored to each student and providing feedback in real time.”

Effective education is not about memorizing— Albert Einstein said, “Never memorize something that you can look up in books.” Today that could be changed to never memorize something that you can look up on Google. John emphases how this is never truer than today where students (and everyone) have access to the greatest vast amount of information.

Steve Job’s vision of education— Steve jobs said, “American classrooms were still based on teachers standing at a board and using textbooks. All books, learning materials, and assessments should be digital and interactive, tailored to each student and providing feedback in real time.”

John’s son Kris—When Steve Jobs came to hire John for Apple their executives were only paid about $40,000 a year and at the time he was making at HP about $60,000 a year. So Jobs brought John’s son Kris an Apple II to play with that evening. Jobs told his son if he could get his dad to work for Apple he could keep the computer. Kris grabbed the computer and was engaged in learning for hours upon hours. Kris taught John that through engaging technology, there was a difference in “education” vs “learning”.

John shared an example of an educational task done for “education” vs one done for “learning”.

The task: “is your drinking water safe to drink and why?”

The task completed for “education” would assign the students to read the chapter on drinking water, review the sample questions, take the quiz, and the teacher would give a grade.

The task completed for “learning” would give the students the tools and ask the students to discover what is safe drinking water, then would ask them to find how to test the drinking water, then test the drinking water, and then demonstrate how they tested the water, where they learned the water was safe to drink, and who determined what is safe?

Publication1The task for “learning” is not only greatly more engaging, but it is the discovery. John shared this chart comparing “education” vs “learning”.

John shared about a 12 year long educational study Apple published in 1997 studying the impact on students using technology in education. What the study demonstrated was the greatest impact was “student engagement”. In 2010 Apple published a follow up study on the impacts on technology on education this time factoring in the use of the Internet. The study showed that technology integration resulted in relevant, creative, collaborative and challenging learning.

John explained that Apple’s is committed to creating environments and application that “lets students create”.

As I listen to John’s message I couldn’t help but feel that this a similar vision of technology in education that not only do I personally hold, but that I feel Citrus County School Board, Superintendent and our leaders and educators hold. I am excited about the direction we continue to support with technology in education in Citrus County.

Chronicle: One more garbage conflict resolved

Chronicle 12-02-2015Chronicle: One more garbage conflict resolved

“This appears to end the issue peacefully, which it should.”

THE ISSUE: Citrus County Schools plan to bid out garbage collection in Inverness.

CHRONICLE’S OPINION: What’s good for one should be good for all.

Please read the Chronicle editorial for December 2nd, 2015 by following this link goo.gl/geWpHF

Chronicle Updates on Best & Brights and speaks to its architect’s Aide

Chronicle Updates on Best & Brights and speaks to its architect’s Aide

200-Erik-FresenFresen’s Aide says teachers don’t deserve extra time for deadline

Chronicle reporter, Andrew Caplan writes an excellent update on the flawed “Best & Brightest” bonus program.

Here is what the architect of the bonus Rep. Erik Fresen, R-Miami, Aide said of the teachers not being able to make the legislature’s unrealistic deadlines, “What would teachers do if one of their students missed a deadline?

Click on link to read whole article: goo.gl/xGmvH4

Flawed teacher’s bonus program based on SAT/ACT scores the Legislature wants to be made permanent

Flawed teacher’s bonus program based on SAT/ACT scores the Legislature wants to be made permanent

for-the-bestThe Tampa Bay Times is reporting that Florida House Education Committee will consider legislation to make the flawed and controversial ‘Best and Brightest’ teacher bonus program permanent. (see ‘Florida’s controversial teacher bonus based on SAT scores returns’; http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/gradebook/floridas-controversial-teacher-bonus-based-on-sat-scores-returns/2255954)

This would mean that potentially the State Legislature would spend $44 million taxpayer dollars a year to give teachers up to $10,000 in bonus wages—but only if they had SAT or ACT test scores in the 80th percentile. The Florida Senate is also going to be taking up this issue and they have a little different approach. They still want to tie the bonus to SAT and ACT scores but they want to lower the scores required down to the 60th percentile in hopes of giving more teachers and opportunity of receiving the bonus.

Here is a thought—if the Legislature wants to reward those teaching (and I greatly welcome that thinking) why not provide those funds proportionately to each district to distribute as they see fit locally. Why is the Legislature micromanaging our local communities? Why are those that are often critical of the Federal Government’s overreaching tactics are doing the same thing to local school districts?

If this is about trying to help with the national and state wide teaching shortage we are entering then there are far better methods to encouraging and incentifying people to become teachers. For example increase teacher college tuition grants which are then tied to minimum number of years of service in a public school. This would both benefit the individual teacher and our schools and communities.

$44 million tax dollars last State budget cycle were set aside to give teacher bonuses due to test scores many of them took as juniors and seniors in high school. Further the Legislature ignored again the concerns of this program expressed by parents, teachers, administrators, superintendents, school board members, and community leaders. We must ask again—when it comes to public educational policies and funding who does the Legislature listen too?