Archive for Blog Posts

New Co-Located Schools Law gets an F

“May thanks to the Citrus Chronicle for first publishing this column on Sunday, May 1st, 2016.”

New Co-Located Schools Law gets an F

28574-3Accountability and grading of schools in Florida is not new, dating back to the late 1990’s.  What is are some of the new laws on how these grades are calculated.  In general, all schools funded by the State of Florida either receive a grade from an A to F, or a rating. Most elementary schools receive a grade based on student performance and improvement on tests in English Language Arts, mathematics, and science.  This grading formula becomes more complex at the middle school level where additional subjects are included, such as Civics.  Added to this calculation is students’ performance on high school level classes and career/technical/vocational tests that lead to Industry Certification.  The high school grades are the most complicated because it includes students’ outcomes and improvement on multiple subject areas, accelerated course test results (Advanced Placement, International Baccalaureate, dual enrollment, Industry Certification, etc.), and graduation rate.

Alternative schools and schools for students with severe cognitive disabilities DO NOT receive a grade but rather a rating that uses a completely different set of criteria and formulas.  Improvement for these schools is defined with the following ratings; Commendable, Maintaining, and Unsatisfactory.  Citrus County School District has three school sites that fit this category; CREST School, Renaissance Center, and MYcroSchool (a charter school).  There are also unique situations where schools such as these may not receive any grade or rating due to ineligible students.

Now imagine you have two of these schools that operate out of one building. One school, the Renaissance Center, on one side of the building deals with students who could be expelled but instead are given the opportunity to continue their studies in this alternate setting in hopes of turning around their lives so that they may return to their original school. The other school, MYcroSchool, on the other side of the building takes students who are dropouts and helps them finish the courses they need in order to receive their diploma. Due to the nature of these two schools neither school receives a grade from the Florida Department of Education but would instead receive a rating.  Both of these schools occupy the same building at the Rodger Weaver Educational Complex in Lecanto and both are successfully fulfilling their intended purpose. However, thanks to new Florida law “Co-Located schools” [F.S. 1008.34 (3) (a) (3)], these two schools may be required to receive an F grade.

What is Florida’s “Co-Located schools” law?  This law refers to two schools that are located in the same building. This new Florida law states; “If a collocated school does not earn a school grade or school improvement rating for the performance of its students, the student performance data of all schools operating at the same facility must be aggregated to develop a school grade that will be assigned to all schools at that location.” Or more simply put, if two schools are located in the same building, each school will receive the lesser of the lowest grade possible for both schools; in this case, an “F”.  It appears the initial purpose of this law was to ensure that schools did not try to “hide” poorly performing students at traditional schools and thus avoid being graded as an “F” school.

Even though the Renaissance Center and the MYcroSchool are successfully performing their missions and helping students and due to their mission WOULD NOT have received a school grade, under this law these two schools could earn an “F” grade for no other reason that they are located in the same building.

If these two schools were not located side-by-side in the same building, they would NOT earn a combined rating that most likely would be an “F”. They would not need to receive any grade, they would receive a rating.

Why is this an issue? Because of this law and the resulting F grade, Citrus County schools will likely lose our status as a High-Performing School district by the Florida Department of Education.  In order to be a High-Performing district the law states the district may not have any “district-operated school that earns a grade of ‘F’”. For MYcroSchool the effect could be far more devastating as two years of an “F” grade would by law result in the charter school being automatically closed and unable to open another charter school in Florida.

Our district sought relief from the Florida Department of Education by noting that the law’s intended purpose was being misapplied to our situation. We also assumed that Citrus County Schools must not be the only district in the state that was facing this issue as it is common to co-locate schools and share common spaces because it can be a lower operational cost to do so. In fact Florida law [F.S. 1002.33 (18) (e)] requires that school districts offer any available space to charter schools. The State said that other districts resolved the situation by simply revising the address of one of the schools. At a recent State training for school districts, the State explained the process for modifying the address for this very purpose. So one would think this matter could be easily resolved. WRONG!

There is another Florida law that appears to contradict the remedy of simply changing a school address. It indicates that the schools must be separated, and that the opportunity for an official different parcel address does not match requirements outlined in the state’s Florida Inventory Of School Houses (FISH) User’s Manual. (Page 44 states, “A structure that has the same floors, ceiling, walls, and is not separated from another structure by an open air space is considered one building.”)

The Florida Department of Education and Commissioner Stewart has been diligently trying to work with our School District to find a legal remedy but at this time there seems to be very few options and their hands tied.

At our School Board Special meeting and workshop this past Tuesday, April 26th, 2016, there was consensus by the school board members that if there was not a commonsense legal solution offered, that our only common sense remedy was to modify the address as suggested by the State.

By modifying the address neither of the two schools would receive an F grade.  By modifying the address the School District does risk violating the FISH User’s Manual. It is a risk I am willing to take to ensure that common sense is applied in the operations of our local school district.  I also believe it shows that the Citrus School district is trying to adhere to the spirit of the co-located law.

For me, this is another example of the State’s overreaching in governing our local school district and using the Florida School Accountability system punitively against our schools, teachers, and most importantly, our students. Nothing in this situation is about true accountability. None of this is what is best for our students. What taxpayers should also be concerned with is that none of this is based in laws that were decided locally for Citrus County’s students.

Thomas Kennedy is a School Board Member for Citrus County School District. Read his blog at http://www.thomastalks.org.

Chronicle: ‘Action needed on Forest Ridge Sidewalk’

Chronicle: ‘Action needed on Forest Ridge Sidewalk’

34304-10Grateful for the Citrus County Chronicle‘s Editorial and position and support of the Forest Ridge/Beverly Hills Sidewalk needs and pleased with the commitment of the staff of the Citrus County Planning Department & Health Department’s efforts to provide a safe route for students and adults.

This is been a project that the people of Beverly Hills have been asking for for sometime. Through the Safe Routes to School grant funding we might best fund this project (rather then ad valorem taxes).

This area is the most residential densely saturated areas that does not have a sidewalk, not only in Citrus County, but in the state of Florida which is why the state has even given it a priority.

The sidewalk would run from Publix, to the new adult apartment complex, down to the library, and down to the Beverly Hills community centers.

This is a project that has come about through the citizens of Beverly Hills. When we had public hearings on this we had residents of Beverly Hills come to the meeting who talk about how they have to walk on the side of the road and in the grass and how unsafe it is as well as how many more people it would serve.

Chronicle’s Position:

THE ISSUE:New sidewalks along Forest Ridge planned. …eventually.

OUR OPINION:Students and seniors need safe routes sooner rather than later

Read the whole editorial by following this link: http://goo.gl/tsrrax

Washington Post: Citrus is AGAIN among America’s Most Challenging High Schools 2016

Washington Post: Citrus is AGAIN among America’s Most Challenging High Schools 2016

Today we learned that all three of our high schools in Citrus County were again recognized by the Washington Post as “America’s Most Challenging High Schools”.

Of the 28,561 high schools in the US, about 2,500 are recognized. Rankings are based on the total number of Advanced Placement, International Baccalaureate, and Advanced International Certificate of Education tests, and college level coursework given in a school year divided by the number of seniors who graduate in May. The schools that earn this challenge honor are among the top 9% of schools in the US.

The publisher of The Washington Post personally called Citrus County School District’s Director of Research and Accountability Patrick Simon to share with him the positive news of how Citrus continues to excel nationally. The publisher shared how Citrus continues to gain the attention Washington Post’s for continually being an outlier with student success with the challenges of being in a rural community with a high number of economically disadvantage households.

Lecanto High School is now ranked 761 out of 2,500 awarded schools, Citrus High Schools is 1,822, and Crystal River High School improving even more significantly again to be awarded 1,572.

Read Citrus Chronicle News Editor Brad Bautista wrote a special report on today news; Citrus County’s high schools are still among the best in the nationhttp://goo.gl/BNyVYe

Follow this link to the website http://apps.washingtonpost.com/local/highschoolchallenge/schools/2016/list/national/

or to read more about America’s Most Challenging High School go to: http://apps.washingtonpost.com/local/highschoolchallenge/

Blessings program makes difference

Blessings program makes difference

CaptureWe all know that the intake of food is vital for physical performance.  In addition, social scientists and nutritionists have long known there is a definitive link between nutrition and learning.

The Citrus County Blessings program was started in 2009 to address the needs of hungry school children.  Its singular purpose is to help feed children of less fortunate families on the weekends, so they will be ready to learn on Monday mornings.

Sixty-eight percent of school age children in Citrus County are enrolled in federally funded subsidy food programs. That translates to the possibility of a large number of children not having proper access to food during days they are not in school.

The Blessings program works in close cooperation with guidance counselors, teachers and administrators from Citrus County public schools. School personnel help identify the neediest children and enroll them in the program.  The schools do not reveal identifying information  about the students enrolled, just the number of children in the school who have a need.  A network of volunteers pack the meals and deliver them to schools, and the kids pick up the meals on their way to buses on the last day of the week.

Blessings currently serves 1,450 students in 18 local schools. The program services all mainstream public schools in Citrus County. Surprisingly, it only takes $125 to feed one child for 35 weekends during the school year. Seventy-six percent of the children served are ages 6-11, and 24 percent are ages 12-18. Participating schools report that children benefit in the following ways:

  • Increased access to vitamin-fortified food.
  • Increased attendance at school.
  • Higher test scores.
  • Reduced behavioral problems.
  • Increased parental participation.

Citrus County Blessings is completely dependent on money and food contributions to keep this program going.  The ongoing generosity of so many people is a testament to the character of all the communities in Citrus County – but, there is still a need. You can “Adopt a Child” for $125 per year or you can donate an amount that is affordable for you.  You may also donate food.  Many banks and businesses have donation containers with flyers explaining the guidelines for food donations. Visit http://citruscountyblessings.com/ to find out how you can make a difference in the life of a Citrus County child.

Koch Awarded PBS LEAD LearningMedia Digital Innovator for Florida and Leonard for Digital Innovator

Koch Awarded PBS LEAD LearningMedia Digital Innovator for Florida and Leonard for Digital Innovator

Dan-KochPBS announced the 2016 PBS LearningMedia Digital Innovators, Citrus County Schools Dan Koch, media specialist for Citrus Springs Middle School was awarded 2016 PBS LEAD LearningMedia Digital Innovator for Florida.  Zachary Leonard from Lecanto Middle School was awarded 2016 PBS LearningMedia Digital Innovator.

PBS shared about Koch:

Dan is an Apple Distinguished Educator, English teacher, media specialist, and technology coach in Citrus County, Florida. He’s passionate about breaking down technology barriers, empowering all learners (that includes teachers!), and believes strongly that tech truly allows us to do something different (and meaningful). With even marginal access to the internet, students can tap into the collective consciousness of countless experts on any given subject, create something new with that knowledge, and share their creativity and innovations with the world. We should be excited about this every day.

Dan’s Favorite PBS LearningMedia resource: Is Futurama the Best Argument Against Transhumanism?

Zac LeonardThese two Citrus Schools educators are part of an impressive group of educators from across the country who will receive one year of free professional development from PBS. The professional development program focus on developing a tech-savvy group of educators that will serve as digital learning ambassadors to go out into classrooms throughout our country.

In addition, to the Award and professional development Koch will represent Florida at the PBS LearningMedia Digital Innovator Summit in Denver at the 2016 ISTE conference.

Congratulations to Koch and Leonard on their Awards and for Citrus School from benefiting by the impressive curriculum digital innovators.

Competency Based Testing: ‘Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain’

Competency Based Testing: ‘Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain’

wizard-of-oz-man-behind-the-curtain1Towards the end of the Wizard of Oz, while Dorothy and her friends are being addressed by the Great and Powerful Wizard of Oz, the dog Toto runs off to the side, pulls back the curtain, and reveals a man operating cranks and levers. The Wizard orders them to “pay the man no attention” but has to give up when he realizes he has been seen for what he really is.

In a similar manner the wizards of education– the same entities that gave you Common Core– are now trying to convince parents, teachers, and communities that they want to reduce testing and do away with testing as we know it by replacing it with something called “Competency Based Testing” (CBT).  CBTs are being ‘sold’ to the public as a better way to assess our students and their teachers. However, the public has looked behind the curtain and realized on their journey down education’s yellow brick road that they have been tricked and are about to be tricked again.

Formative Assessments are used by teachers to help determine where their students are at in understanding a concept; teachers also use data from formative assessments to help them adjust curriculum, assignments and content so they can better meet students’ needs.  Who benefits from formative assessments? Teachers and students.  There is no grade promotion or punitive consequence associated with the results of formative assessments. Data is used so that teachers teach what is necessary and students have an opportunity to spend time only on what they need to learn. Legislators have decided to seize this valuable tool, relabel formative assessments “CBTs” and use them as high-stakes tests that will determine students’ promotion and teachers’ evaluations. Legislators, along with curriculum publishers (a.k.a. textbook companies), and lobbyists are selling these CBTs as the fix to high-stakes testing.  These people– the same people that promoted high-stakes tests in the first place– are telling us they have the solution. Really?

Many parent groups are already lining up to voice their concern about CBTs.  United for Florida Children founder Laura McCrary recently wrote, “I am going to be blunt here.  If parents don’t wake up and take a stand right now, this year, we will only have ourselves to blame.  Ask yourself this.  How do you see education in four to six years?  I can promise you it won’t be the friendly teacher- driven classrooms we are seeing today.  Changes are being made from the top down right now as you are reading this, and it isn’t pretty.  It is called Competency Based Education (also known as Competency Based Learning, Outcome Based Education, Personalized Learning, and Performance Based Education to name a few).”  Please read the rest of her column which gives a great deal of background and information on CBTs: https://unitedforflchildren.com/2016/02/18/competency-based-education/

Here are two recent articles regarding concerns of CBTs by Dr. Diane Ravitch, Research Professor of Education at New York University and a historian of education: http://dianeravitch.net/2016/02/04/warning-digitized-instruction-data-mining/ and http://dianeravitch.net/2015/12/23/peter-goodman-the-next-battleground-competency-based-education/

Florida Stop Common Core Coalition a statewide organization by parents, grandparents, teachers, small business owners, and concerned citizens voice their concerns about CBTs: http://www.flstopcccoalition.org/blog/concerns-about-competency-based-education.htm.

So how fast is this issue developing?  On Friday, March 25, 2016, Florida Governor Scott signed into law The Competency-Based Education Pilot Program. The bill creates a Competency-Based Education Pilot Program through HB 1365 and sets up a five-year pilot program in certain Florida counties with the goal of letting students advance through school if they can prove they’ve mastered what they should be learning.  This means these CBTs are replacing the Florida Standards Assessment (Common Core assessment) that the legislators themselves passed into law.  Will CBTs be testing Common Core standards? Yes, the pilot Florida CBTs will test Florida Standards, which are Common Core standards.  Again, the legislators are trying to mislead the public. They want to give an illusion that they have done away with testing.  They haven’t; they have done something worse.  They are taking an excellent classroom tool—formative assessment—bastardizing it, and calling it Competency Based Testing.

What the legislators should be doing when it comes to Florida public education and state -mandated testing is stopping the regulation and over-regulation of public education. If the Legislature truly wants to reduce the number of mandated test students take then they need to do just that.  Right now the Legislature claims that they have reduced the number of mandated tests. Really what they have done is reduced state- mandated tests in some cases, but then required that teachers’ evaluations are based on their students’ test scores. The Legislature can claim they haven’t mandated the test, but they in reality did mandate that a test be used.  The Florida Legislature has for a number of years asserted that for private businesses to grow more jobs and for businesses to be more successful, more deregulation of mandated laws needs occur.  Yet these same legislators take the very opposite approach when it comes to public education.  It is a testament to our public schools that they have succeeded over and over operating under the most stringent of laws.

Many of the most successful countries in the world in math and sciences have learned that for education to be successful teachers (not politicians) need to be at the center of learning and assessments.  It is time that Florida’s next generation of Legislators take this same approach. We have seen behind the curtain and are not impressed.